AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U: 14 nm, Dali (Zen+), 2 X 2.40 GHz, DDR4-2400. 

AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: , Zen 2, 8 X 3.90 GHz, DDR4-3200. 

VS

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Essentials Specifications

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X comparison by their number of cores, threads, base clock speed and speed in turbo boost can be found below. Please pay attention to the model, the specifications of which are the highest, as reflected in the common performance.

2x
Cores
no data
2 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
8 / 16
normal
Core architecture
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
Yes
2.40 GHz
Frequency
3.90 GHz
3.30 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
2.40 GHz
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
no data
Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
4.20 GHz

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
CPU generation and family

CPU Comparison by the type of usage (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Basic data on AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X comparison.

2
CPU Cores
8
Market price
ca. 385 $
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Name
no data
AMD Athlon
Family
no data
AMD Athlon Gold 3000
CPU group
no data
8
Generation
Mobile
Segment
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Processor Graphics

Not every CPU comparison gives the complete picture as not all the models are equipped with a built-in graphic core. Therefore, in the comparison between AMD Athlon Gold 3150U and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, one of the columns can be blank because of the absence of iGPU specifications. If the built-in core is present, we recommend paying attention to the clock speed as other figures are secondary.

AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
GPU name
1.00 GHz
GPU frequency
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
3
Execution units
192
Shader
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
3
Max. displays
8
Generation
12
Direct X
14 nm
Technology
Q1/2018
Release date

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Hardware codec support

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Comparison by hardware support of various codecs and extensions. The section is for informational purposes only as it is not accounted for in benchmarks of synthetic performance testing.

Decode / Encode
h265 8bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 10bit
No
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
h264
No
Decode / Encode
VP8
No
Decode / Encode
VP9
No
No
AV1
Decode / Encode
AVC
No
Decode
VC-1
No
Decode / Encode
JPEG
No

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Memory Specifications

Modern CPUs support the memory operating in the multichannel mode that provides the high-speed exchange of data and increases performance. The higher the clock speed of the ram, its standard (e.g. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum capacity in the system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
4.0
8
PCIe lanes
20
DDR4-2400
Memory type
DDR4-3200
32 GB
Max. Memory
128 GB
2
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
no data
Yes
ECC
Yes
3.0 x 8
PCIe
no data
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Thermal Management (TDP)

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X TDP depict the whole information of a thermal pack. Here you can easily assume which CPU consumes more power and correspondingly requires a power supply of larger capacity. We recommend paying attention to a model with a low TDP as the component system needs the power reserve of not the power supply but the cooling system, as a CPU being loaded up does not always consume more power.

15 W
TDP
105 W
15 W
TDP (PL1)
--
TDP (PL2)
25 W
TDP up
--
12 W
TDP down
--
95 °C
Tjunction max.
95 °C

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of AMD Athlon Gold 3150U and AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, we can see how fast the information is to proceed in the cache memory of L2 and L3. Also, you can compare the architecture of a core, a socket of motherboards and dates of CPUs' release here.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
AMD64
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
ISA extensions
no data
1.00 MB
L2-Cache
4.00 MB
4.00 MB
L3-Cache
32.00 MB
Dali (Zen+)
Architecture
Zen 2
14 nm
Technology
7 nm
AMD-V, SEV
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
FP5
Socket
AM4
Q1/2020
Release date
Q3/2019
--
Part Number
100-100000025BOX

AMD Athlon Gold 3150U vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Use Conditions

Unknown
Used in
PC

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 Benchmark is an upgraded version of Cinebench R15 Benchmark. Similarly to the preceding one, this version was developed on the Cinema 4 Suite software. The benchmark tests the performance of a single-core CPU not given the hyperthreading. Here are the updated results to learn.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 benchmark produced by Maxon is a real cross-platform set of testing which evaluate the total CPU performance and operates on Cinema4D. The score of the Cinebench R23 (single-core) shows how efficient the CPU in games and operation is.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

The Maxon Company has developed an accurate benchmark of CPU performance, Cinebench R20, based on the software complex Cinema 4 Suite. The scenarios of data proceeding and calculations reflect the efficiency high-performance of a CPU given all the cores and hyperthreading support.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is a cross-platform benchmark, which shows the accurate scores of CPU performance. The benchmark’s results reflect the real speed and efficiency of the CPU operation. It is designed on the Cinema 4D software. The testing accounts for hyperthreading and activates all the CPU cores. Learn the results below.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the Cinebench R15 benchmark for testing CPUs upon using a single core not given hyperthreading. The real performance in testing rendering is perfectly suitable for all the CPU segments. Learn Cinebench R15’s results and the number of scores below.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 Benchmark supports all the CPU cores in testing and takes into account hyperthreading. It was developed on the brand software company Cinema 4 Suite of Maxon. The Cinebench R15 scores are presented below.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The testing benchmark iGPU is integrated graphics cores in the central processor. The general graphics performance to benchmark the high-speed performance of the video chip is tested. The evaluation scores are presented below. Pay attention that not every manufacturer builds in an inner graphics core. Thus, the general results of the performance do not depend on this parameter, that is considered of good advantage.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Many wonders how good the scores of Geekbench 5 in testing CPUs are. So, we are here to answer: they are accurate and impartial to brands. The higher the evaluation of Geekbench 5 in testing performance of a CPU single core is, the better. Check out the results and compare them.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A 64-bit version of Geekbench 5 is used for testing CPU performance using all the cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 for multi-core models shows scores of how performing and fast a chip is in the review or comparison.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender 2.81 (BMW 27) tests the gaming performance of a CPU which is checked by the various scenarios of 3D image rendering. The testing result is presented below.

PassMark CPU Mark

The evaluation of PassMark benchmark is more authoritative among all the experienced users. Exactly the PassMark takes the lead in testing CPU performance. The evaluation result of CPU speed is checked in the condition of complex calculation and 3D rendering.

Monero Hashrate kH/s

Here is the evaluation of CPU performance in cryptocurrency mining XMR (Monero). We have collected the accurate scores of each CPU so that you can define its efficiency in the mining of Monero cryptocurrency. Data is updated regularly.