NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
AMD Radeon HD 8790M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295: 540 MHz / , 256 MB, 65 nm.

AMD Radeon HD 8790M: 850 MHz / 900 MHz, 2 GB, 28 nm.

VS

General Information

Here is the comparison of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M  by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.

not rated
Place in performance rating
597
1.56
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla
Architecture
GCN
G98
Code name
Mars
Workstation
Type
Laptop
7 May 2009 (12 years ago)
Release date
16 November 2012 (9 years ago)
$54.50
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$54 (1x MSRP)
Price now
$460
no data
Value for money
0.26
G98
GPU code name
Mars XTX
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical Specifications

It is the important section of comparison between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.

8
Pipelines
384
540 MHz
Core clock speed
850 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
900 MHz
210 million
Transistor count
950 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
23 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
4.320
Texture fill rate
21.60
20.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
8
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
900 MHz
210 million
Number of transistors
950 million
23 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Dimensions and Compatibility

Comparing NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 or AMD Radeon HD 8790M , has a better memory.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1390 MHz
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
11.12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Port and Display Support

Let’s compare NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.

2x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.

1.1
CUDA
no data

API support

The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 and AMD Radeon HD 8790M in these parameters is.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.131
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
1.1
OpenCL
1.2

Mining hashrates

no data
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
80 Mh/s

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

Cheaper ($54 (1x MSRP) vs $460)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 8790M

5.66% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 8)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 11.12 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 or AMD Radeon HD 8790M?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend AMD Radeon HD 8790M .

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs AMD Radeon HD 8790M in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

As 3DMark Cloud Gate Benchmark supports DirectX 10, its evaluation is rather suitable for GPUs of a medium level or the ones released 4 years ago.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

3DMark Company has created a benchmark for GPUs called "Fire Strike Score", which points to the definite scenarios for fulfilling different variants and conditions of GPU running. The higher the evaluation of the 3DMark "Fire Strike Score" is, the more performing and faster a GPU is.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike is a benchmark of GPUs, which reflects a GPU's testing results under factory conditions without overclocking, making it the most realistic in contrast to the custom dimensions of performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark accounts a GPU performance in multithreading that completely reveals all the potential of a graphics core and memory. Check the results to understand which GPU is better in the benchmark.

Passmark GPU

It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.

Is the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 better than AMD Radeon HD 8790M? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

4.0 Out of User Rating
4.3 Out of User Rating