NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D: 625 MHz / , 1 GB, 40 nm.

NVIDIA Quadro P600: 1430 MHz / 1557 MHz, 2 GB, 14 nm.


General Information

Here is the comparison of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600  by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.

Place in performance rating
Value for money (0-100)
Code name
5 October 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
14 November 2017 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$79 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$207 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money
GPU code name
Market segment

Technical Specifications

It is the important section of comparison between NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600 which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.

625 MHz
Core clock speed
1430 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1,170 million
Transistor count
3,300 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
62 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
40 Watt
Texture fill rate
480.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
1,117 gflops
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
Boost clock speed
1620 MHz
1,170 million
Number of transistors
3,300 million
62 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
40 Watt

Dimensions and Compatibility

Comparing NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.

PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
178 mm
145 mm
Supplementary power connectors

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or NVIDIA Quadro P600 , has a better memory.

Memory type
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
2600 MHz
Memory clock speed
5012 MHz
41.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64.13 GB/s
no data
Shared memory

Port and Display Support

Let’s compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.

2x DVI
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort


Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.

no data
Multi Monitor

API support

The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600 in these parameters is.

12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model

Mining hashrates

31 Mh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
no data

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

Cheaper ($79 (0.1x MSRP) vs $207 (1.2x MSRP))

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P600

11.35% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 192)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (40 Watt vs 62 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (64.13 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s)

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or NVIDIA Quadro P600?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend NVIDIA Quadro P600 .

NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is a modern synthetic benchmark for GPUs, used for evaluating performance in rendering. In 3DMark Ice Storm, you can check how fast a GPU of the old generation is and make conclusions about its modernization.

243785 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

As 3DMark Cloud Gate Benchmark supports DirectX 10, its evaluation is rather suitable for GPUs of a medium level or the ones released 4 years ago.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

3DMark Company has created a benchmark for GPUs called "Fire Strike Score", which points to the definite scenarios for fulfilling different variants and conditions of GPU running. The higher the evaluation of the 3DMark "Fire Strike Score" is, the more performing and faster a GPU is.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike is a benchmark of GPUs, which reflects a GPU's testing results under factory conditions without overclocking, making it the most realistic in contrast to the custom dimensions of performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

The benchmark by the SPECviewperf 12 Company with Solidworks version allows evaluating GPU performance in the rendering of Audi R8, Black Owl, Digger, Ferrari, Menjac, SpaceShipCrawler and a supercar. Check benchmark results to make the right decision.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the number of scenarios Siemens NX operates on the version of the apps snx-02 and is used for testing GPU in Car Engine 3D Modelling. Learn the results.

Octane Render OctaneBench

OctaneRender by OctaneBench is a real benchmark impartial to testing. It reflects the performance of GPU in factory settings without overclocking. Look at the testing results to define the number of scores (if necessary, compare with competitors).

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the scenario of Medical is one of the most complicated GPUs because of using complex 4D medical graphics models upon testing. It was developed by the Department of Radiology at Stanford School of Medicine. It is very suitable for testing modern GPU models.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the special set of Maya scripts is a universal evaluating tool for calculating GPU power in 3D Modelling. The different visual effects involving memory and graphics processor are applied in the benchmark.

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

The benchmark by SPECviewperf 12 was released under the code name Energy. In the benchmark, apart from testing desktop GPUs, you can see the mobile ones installed in laptops.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark has been created with the code name Creo, which tests GPUs' performance in Cars and Aircraft 3D Modelling.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

The benchmark of SPECviewperf 12 with the code name Catia tests a GPU in 3D Modelling using various visual effects. The objects of rendering are aircraft, an SUV and a car.

Passmark GPU

It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.

Is the NVIDIA Quadro 2000D better than NVIDIA Quadro P600? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

5.0 Out of User Rating
4.1 Out of User Rating