NVIDIA Quadro 2000D: 625 MHz / , 1 GB, 40 nm.
NVIDIA Quadro P600: 1430 MHz / 1557 MHz, 2 GB, 14 nm.
Here is the comparison of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600 by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.
It is the important section of comparison between NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600 which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.
Dimensions and Compatibility
Comparing NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.
Graphics memory (technical specifications)
GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or NVIDIA Quadro P600 , has a better memory.
Port and Display Support
Let’s compare NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro 2000D by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.
Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.
The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between NVIDIA Quadro 2000D and NVIDIA Quadro P600 in these parameters is.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
Cheaper ($79 (0.1x MSRP) vs $207 (1.2x MSRP))
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P600
11.35% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (384 vs 192)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)
Less power consumption (40 Watt vs 62 Watt)
More maximum RAM amount (2 GB vs 1 GB)
More memory bandwidth (64.13 GB/s vs 41.6 GB/s)
So, NVIDIA Quadro 2000D or NVIDIA Quadro P600?
Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend NVIDIA Quadro P600 .
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro P600 in benchmarks comparison
3DMark Ice Storm is a modern synthetic benchmark for GPUs, used for evaluating performance in rendering. In 3DMark Ice Storm, you can check how fast a GPU of the old generation is and make conclusions about its modernization.
As 3DMark Cloud Gate Benchmark supports DirectX 10, its evaluation is rather suitable for GPUs of a medium level or the ones released 4 years ago.
3DMark Company has created a benchmark for GPUs called "Fire Strike Score", which points to the definite scenarios for fulfilling different variants and conditions of GPU running. The higher the evaluation of the 3DMark "Fire Strike Score" is, the more performing and faster a GPU is.
3DMark Fire Strike is a benchmark of GPUs, which reflects a GPU's testing results under factory conditions without overclocking, making it the most realistic in contrast to the custom dimensions of performance.
Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.
The benchmark by the SPECviewperf 12 Company with Solidworks version allows evaluating GPU performance in the rendering of Audi R8, Black Owl, Digger, Ferrari, Menjac, SpaceShipCrawler and a supercar. Check benchmark results to make the right decision.
SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the number of scenarios Siemens NX operates on the version of the apps snx-02 and is used for testing GPU in Car Engine 3D Modelling. Learn the results.
OctaneRender by OctaneBench is a real benchmark impartial to testing. It reflects the performance of GPU in factory settings without overclocking. Look at the testing results to define the number of scores (if necessary, compare with competitors).
SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the scenario of Medical is one of the most complicated GPUs because of using complex 4D medical graphics models upon testing. It was developed by the Department of Radiology at Stanford School of Medicine. It is very suitable for testing modern GPU models.
SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark with the special set of Maya scripts is a universal evaluating tool for calculating GPU power in 3D Modelling. The different visual effects involving memory and graphics processor are applied in the benchmark.
The benchmark by SPECviewperf 12 was released under the code name Energy. In the benchmark, apart from testing desktop GPUs, you can see the mobile ones installed in laptops.
SPECviewperf 12 Benchmark has been created with the code name Creo, which tests GPUs' performance in Cars and Aircraft 3D Modelling.
The benchmark of SPECviewperf 12 with the code name Catia tests a GPU in 3D Modelling using various visual effects. The objects of rendering are aircraft, an SUV and a car.
It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.