AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150:  / 1053 MHz, 4 GB, 14 nm.

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO: 600 MHz / , 512 MB, 80 nm.

VS

General Information

Here is the comparison of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO  by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.

495
Place in performance rating
812
Polaris
Architecture
TeraScale
Polaris 11
Code name
R600
Mobile workstation
Type
Desktop
1 March 2017 (5 years ago)
Release date
12 December 2007 (14 years ago)
$2000
Price now
no data
0.90
Value for money
no data
Polaris 11
GPU code name
R600
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical Specifications

It is the important section of comparison between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.

896
Pipelines
320
no data
Core clock speed
600 MHz
1053 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
720 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
80 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
58.97
Texture fill rate
9.600
no data
Floating-point performance
384.0 gflops
896
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
1053 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,000 million
Number of transistors
720 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
200 Watt

Dimensions and Compatibility

Comparing AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Length
241 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 or ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO , has a better memory.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR3
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
7000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
96 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Port and Display Support

Let’s compare AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.

+
FreeSync
no data
+
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
no data

API support

The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 and ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO in these parameters is.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2.131
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150

5.79% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (896 vs 320)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (96 GB/s vs 51.2 GB/s)

Advantages of ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

So, AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 or ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 .

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

Passmark GPU

It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.

Is the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 better than ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

3.0 Out of User Rating
5.0 Out of User Rating