AMD Baffin
NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

AMD Baffin: 855 MHz / 1200 MHz, , 14 nm.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M:  / , 1 GB, 28 nm.

VS

General Information

Here is the comparison of AMD Baffin and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M  by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.

not rated
Place in performance rating
913
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Fermi
Baffin
Code name
GF117
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
1 October 2012 (9 years ago)
$59
Price now
$310
4.0
GCN generation
no data
no data
Value for money
0.03
Baffin
GPU code name
N13M-GS
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical Specifications

It is the important section of comparison between AMD Baffin and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.

1024
Pipelines
96
855 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,000 million
Transistor count
585 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
80 W
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
Floating-point performance
240.0 gflops
CUDA cores
96
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
96
3,000 million
Number of transistors
585 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Dimensions and Compatibility

Comparing AMD Baffin and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.

Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size
medium sized
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, AMD Baffin or NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M , has a better memory.

Memory type
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Shared memory
-

Port and Display Support

Let’s compare AMD Baffin and AMD Baffin by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.

Display Connectors
No outputs
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
HDMI
+

Technologies

Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.

CUDA
+
Optimus
+
Verde Drivers
+
3D Blu-Ray
+
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
DirectCompute
+

API support

The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between AMD Baffin and NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M in these parameters is.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 API
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
2.1
OpenCL
1.1

Mining hashrates

213 Mh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
no data

Advantages of AMD Baffin

Cheaper ($59 vs $310)

More pipelines (1024 vs 96)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M

1.85% faster in synthetic tests

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 80 W)

So, AMD Baffin or NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M .

AMD Baffin vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.

Passmark GPU

It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.

Is the AMD Baffin better than NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

5.0 Out of User Rating
5.0 Out of User Rating