Intel Xeon Gold 6130F
VS
Intel Core i3-3225

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F: , Skylake SP, 16 X 2.10 GHz, DDR4-2666. 

Intel Core i3-3225: 22 nm, Ivy Bridge, 2 X 3.30 GHz, DDR3-1600. 

VS

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Essentials Specifications

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs Intel Core i3-3225 comparison by their number of cores, threads, base clock speed and speed in turbo boost can be found below. Please pay attention to the model, the specifications of which are the highest, as reflected in the common performance.

16 / 32
CPU Cores / Threads
2 / 4
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
Yes
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
2.10 GHz
Frequency
3.30 GHz
3.70 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
No turbo
no data
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
No turbo
2.60 GHz
Turbo Frequency (16 Cores)
no data

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
CPU generation and family

CPU Comparison by the type of usage (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Basic data on Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs Intel Core i3-3225 comparison.

16
CPU Cores
2
ca. 2050 $
Market price
ca. 120 $
Generation
7

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Processor Graphics

Not every CPU comparison gives the complete picture as not all the models are equipped with a built-in graphic core. Therefore, in the comparison between Intel Xeon Gold 6130F and Intel Core i3-3225, one of the columns can be blank because of the absence of iGPU specifications. If the built-in core is present, we recommend paying attention to the clock speed as other figures are secondary.

GPU name
Intel HD Graphics 4000
GPU frequency
0.65 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
1.05 GHz
Execution units
16
Shader
128
Max. displays
3
Generation
7
Direct X
11.0
Technology
22 nm
Release date
Q1/2011

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Hardware codec support

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs Intel Core i3-3225 Comparison by hardware support of various codecs and extensions. The section is for informational purposes only as it is not accounted for in benchmarks of synthetic performance testing.

no data
h265 8bit
No
no data
h265 10bit
No
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
No
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
No
No
VP9
No
No
AV1
no data
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
No
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Memory Specifications

Modern CPUs support the memory operating in the multichannel mode that provides the high-speed exchange of data and increases performance. The higher the clock speed of the ram, its standard (e.g. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum capacity in the system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
48
PCIe lanes
DDR4-2666
Memory type
DDR3-1600
6
Memory channels
2
Yes
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
No

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Thermal Management (TDP)

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F and Intel Core i3-3225 TDP depict the whole information of a thermal pack. Here you can easily assume which CPU consumes more power and correspondingly requires a power supply of larger capacity. We recommend paying attention to a model with a low TDP as the component system needs the power reserve of not the power supply but the cooling system, as a CPU being loaded up does not always consume more power.

no data
TDP
55 W
135 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
--
--
Tjunction max.
--

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of Intel Xeon Gold 6130F and Intel Core i3-3225, we can see how fast the information is to proceed in the cache memory of L2 and L3. Also, you can compare the architecture of a core, a socket of motherboards and dates of CPUs' release here.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
--
L2-Cache
no data
22.00 MB
L3-Cache
3.00 MB
Skylake SP
Architecture
Ivy Bridge
14 nm
Technology
22 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, vPro
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT
LGA 3647
Socket
LGA 1155
Q3/2017
Release date
Q3/2012

Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs. Intel Core i3-3225
Use Conditions

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the Cinebench R15 benchmark for testing CPUs upon using a single core not given hyperthreading. The real performance in testing rendering is perfectly suitable for all the CPU segments. Learn Cinebench R15’s results and the number of scores below.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 Benchmark supports all the CPU cores in testing and takes into account hyperthreading. It was developed on the brand software company Cinema 4 Suite of Maxon. The Cinebench R15 scores are presented below.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The testing benchmark iGPU is integrated graphics cores in the central processor. The general graphics performance to benchmark the high-speed performance of the video chip is tested. The evaluation scores are presented below. Pay attention that not every manufacturer builds in an inner graphics core. Thus, the general results of the performance do not depend on this parameter, that is considered of good advantage.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Many wonders how good the scores of Geekbench 5 in testing CPUs are. So, we are here to answer: they are accurate and impartial to brands. The higher the evaluation of Geekbench 5 in testing performance of a CPU single core is, the better. Check out the results and compare them.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A 64-bit version of Geekbench 5 is used for testing CPU performance using all the cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 for multi-core models shows scores of how performing and fast a chip is in the review or comparison.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64 bit (single-core) is a benchmark used for testing CPUs in hard scenarios such as calculation and rendering in single-core operation. The testing results of performance are presented below.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64 bit (multi-core) is the first version of the professional synthetic benchmark which tests CPU performance in various scenarios of rendering and calculations. The benchmark involves all the cores and activates hyperthreading of a CPU.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 Benchmark for single-core CPUs is the first version of a professional synthetic app for testing performance. Cinebench R11.5 tests a single-core of a CPU without hyperthreading based on Cinema 4 Suite app. It suits the speed evaluation of CPUs of an earlier generation.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is used for multi-core given hyperthreading. Cinebench R11.5 tests the performance of all the CPU cores in the Cinema 4 Suite software. The results of the performance evaluation of all the CPU cores in Cinebench R11.5 can be found below.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark tests the performance of the graphics core integrated into the central processor. The earlier version of the benchmark shows the accurate evaluation of the high speed of the built-in GPU in the OpenGL app.

PassMark CPU Mark

The evaluation of PassMark benchmark is more authoritative among all the experienced users. Exactly the PassMark takes the lead in testing CPU performance. The evaluation result of CPU speed is checked in the condition of complex calculation and 3D rendering.