Intel Atom x6425E
VS
Intel Core i7-1065G7

Intel Atom x6425E: 10 nm, Elkhart Lake, 4 X 1.80 GHz, DDR4-3200 LPDDR4X-4266. 

Intel Core i7-1065G7: 10 nm, Ice Lake U, 4 X 1.30 GHz, DDR4-3200 LPDDR4-3733. 

VS

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Essentials Specifications

Intel Atom x6425E vs Intel Core i7-1065G7 comparison by their number of cores, threads, base clock speed and speed in turbo boost can be found below. Please pay attention to the model, the specifications of which are the highest, as reflected in the common performance.

4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 8
normal
Core architecture
no data
0x
A core
no data
0x
B core
no data
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
1.80 GHz
Frequency
1.30 GHz
3.00 GHz
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
3.90 GHz
2.70 GHz
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
3.50 GHz

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
CPU generation and family

CPU Comparison by the type of usage (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Basic data on Intel Atom x6425E vs Intel Core i7-1065G7 comparison.

4
CPU Cores
4
Market price
ca. 390 $
11
Generation
11

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Processor Graphics

Not every CPU comparison gives the complete picture as not all the models are equipped with a built-in graphic core. Therefore, in the comparison between Intel Atom x6425E and Intel Core i7-1065G7, one of the columns can be blank because of the absence of iGPU specifications. If the built-in core is present, we recommend paying attention to the clock speed as other figures are secondary.

Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (Elkhart Lake)
GPU name
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 940
0.50 GHz
GPU frequency
0.30 GHz
0.75 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.10 GHz
32
Execution units
48
256
Shader
384
3
Max. displays
3
11
Generation
11
12
Direct X
12
10 nm
Technology
10 nm
Q1/2021
Release date
Q3/2019

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Hardware codec support

Intel Atom x6425E vs Intel Core i7-1065G7 Comparison by hardware support of various codecs and extensions. The section is for informational purposes only as it is not accounted for in benchmarks of synthetic performance testing.

no data
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
no data
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
no data
Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP8
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
no data
Decode / Encode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Memory Specifications

Modern CPUs support the memory operating in the multichannel mode that provides the high-speed exchange of data and increases performance. The higher the clock speed of the ram, its standard (e.g. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum capacity in the system are, the better it is.

3.0
PCIe version
3.0
8
PCIe lanes
16
DDR4-3200 LPDDR4X-4266
Memory type
DDR4-3200 LPDDR4-3733
64 GB
Max. Memory
64 GB
4
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Thermal Management (TDP)

Intel Atom x6425E and Intel Core i7-1065G7 TDP depict the whole information of a thermal pack. Here you can easily assume which CPU consumes more power and correspondingly requires a power supply of larger capacity. We recommend paying attention to a model with a low TDP as the component system needs the power reserve of not the power supply but the cooling system, as a CPU being loaded up does not always consume more power.

no data
TDP
15 W
12 W
TDP (PL1)
no data
--
TDP (PL2)
no data
--
TDP up
25 W
--
TDP down
12 W
105 °C
Tjunction max.
100 °C

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of Intel Atom x6425E and Intel Core i7-1065G7, we can see how fast the information is to proceed in the cache memory of L2 and L3. Also, you can compare the architecture of a core, a socket of motherboards and dates of CPUs' release here.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
no data
1.50 MB
L2-Cache
no data
--
L3-Cache
8.00 MB
Elkhart Lake
Architecture
Ice Lake U
10 nm
Technology
10 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1296
Socket
BGA 1526
Q1/2021
Release date
Q3/2019

Intel Atom x6425E vs. Intel Core i7-1065G7
Use Conditions

Unknown
Used in
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 Benchmark is an upgraded version of Cinebench R15 Benchmark. Similarly to the preceding one, this version was developed on the Cinema 4 Suite software. The benchmark tests the performance of a single-core CPU not given the hyperthreading. Here are the updated results to learn.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 benchmark produced by Maxon is a real cross-platform set of testing which evaluate the total CPU performance and operates on Cinema4D. The score of the Cinebench R23 (single-core) shows how efficient the CPU in games and operation is.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

The Maxon Company has developed an accurate benchmark of CPU performance, Cinebench R20, based on the software complex Cinema 4 Suite. The scenarios of data proceeding and calculations reflect the efficiency high-performance of a CPU given all the cores and hyperthreading support.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the Cinebench R15 benchmark for testing CPUs upon using a single core not given hyperthreading. The real performance in testing rendering is perfectly suitable for all the CPU segments. Learn Cinebench R15’s results and the number of scores below.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 Benchmark supports all the CPU cores in testing and takes into account hyperthreading. It was developed on the brand software company Cinema 4 Suite of Maxon. The Cinebench R15 scores are presented below.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The testing benchmark iGPU is integrated graphics cores in the central processor. The general graphics performance to benchmark the high-speed performance of the video chip is tested. The evaluation scores are presented below. Pay attention that not every manufacturer builds in an inner graphics core. Thus, the general results of the performance do not depend on this parameter, that is considered of good advantage.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Many wonders how good the scores of Geekbench 5 in testing CPUs are. So, we are here to answer: they are accurate and impartial to brands. The higher the evaluation of Geekbench 5 in testing performance of a CPU single core is, the better. Check out the results and compare them.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A 64-bit version of Geekbench 5 is used for testing CPU performance using all the cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 for multi-core models shows scores of how performing and fast a chip is in the review or comparison.

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender 2.81 (BMW 27) tests the gaming performance of a CPU which is checked by the various scenarios of 3D image rendering. The testing result is presented below.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 Benchmark for single-core CPUs is the first version of a professional synthetic app for testing performance. Cinebench R11.5 tests a single-core of a CPU without hyperthreading based on Cinema 4 Suite app. It suits the speed evaluation of CPUs of an earlier generation.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is used for multi-core given hyperthreading. Cinebench R11.5 tests the performance of all the CPU cores in the Cinema 4 Suite software. The results of the performance evaluation of all the CPU cores in Cinebench R11.5 can be found below.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench R11.5 benchmark tests the performance of the graphics core integrated into the central processor. The earlier version of the benchmark shows the accurate evaluation of the high speed of the built-in GPU in the OpenGL app.

PassMark CPU Mark

The evaluation of PassMark benchmark is more authoritative among all the experienced users. Exactly the PassMark takes the lead in testing CPU performance. The evaluation result of CPU speed is checked in the condition of complex calculation and 3D rendering.