NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA TITAN RTX: 1350 MHz / 1770 MHz, 24 GB, 12 nm.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700: 500 MHz / , 512 MB, 65 nm.

VS

General Information

Here is the comparison of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700  by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.

28
Place in performance rating
939
8.38
Value for money (0-100)
5.05
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TU102
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Workstation
18 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
8 January 2008 (14 years ago)
$2,499
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,599
$2076 (0.8x MSRP)
Price now
$81 (0.1x MSRP)
10.96
Value for money
0.05
TU102
GPU code name
G92
Desktop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical Specifications

It is the important section of comparison between NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.

4608
Pipelines
112
1350 MHz
Core clock speed
500 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
18,600 million
Transistor count
754 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
280 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
78 Watt
509.8
Texture fill rate
28.00
no data
Floating-point performance
280 gflops
4608
Pipelines / CUDA cores
112
1770 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
18,600 million
Number of transistors
754 million
280 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
78 Watt

Dimensions and Compatibility

Comparing NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
267 mm
Length
267 mm
2x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics memory (technical specifications)

GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, NVIDIA TITAN RTX or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 , has a better memory.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR3
24 GB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
14000 MHz
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
672.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s

Port and Display Support

Let’s compare NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA TITAN RTX by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.

1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.

7.5
CUDA
1.1

API support

The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 in these parameters is.

12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2.131
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
2.0
OpenCL
1.1

Advantages of NVIDIA TITAN RTX

85.66% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (4608 vs 112)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 65 nm)

More memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s vs 51.2 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

Cheaper ($81 (0.1x MSRP) vs $2076 (0.8x MSRP))

Less power consumption (78 Watt vs 280 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 24 GB)

So, NVIDIA TITAN RTX or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700?

Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend NVIDIA TITAN RTX .

NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 in benchmarks comparison

GPU Benchmark performance

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

3DMark Ice Storm is a modern synthetic benchmark for GPUs, used for evaluating performance in rendering. In 3DMark Ice Storm, you can check how fast a GPU of the old generation is and make conclusions about its modernization.

492606 (100 %)

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

As 3DMark Cloud Gate Benchmark supports DirectX 10, its evaluation is rather suitable for GPUs of a medium level or the ones released 4 years ago.

171714 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Score

3DMark Company has created a benchmark for GPUs called "Fire Strike Score", which points to the definite scenarios for fulfilling different variants and conditions of GPU running. The higher the evaluation of the 3DMark "Fire Strike Score" is, the more performing and faster a GPU is.

24042 (100 %)

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark Fire Strike is a benchmark of GPUs, which reflects a GPU's testing results under factory conditions without overclocking, making it the most realistic in contrast to the custom dimensions of performance.

35447 (100 %)

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.

49047 (100 %)

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark accounts a GPU performance in multithreading that completely reveals all the potential of a graphics core and memory. Check the results to understand which GPU is better in the benchmark.

71673 (100 %)

Passmark GPU

It is professional testing of a GPU in the authoritative benchmark Passmark, which millions of users around the world trust. Only Passmark is able to give the complete picture of GPU performance in our rating, which you can see in this section.

18858 (100 %)

Is the NVIDIA TITAN RTX better than NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700? - UltimatePCtech Rating.

3.9 Out of User Rating
4.0 Out of User Rating