

Intel Iris Graphics 550: 300 MHz / 1100 MHz, 64 MB, 14 nm.
AMD Baffin: 855 MHz / 1200 MHz, , 14 nm.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
General Information
Here is the comparison of Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Baffin by the date of release, starting price at the production and the number of scores in the performing rating. Also, you can see the code name and the architecture of graphics cores.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Technical Specifications
It is the important section of comparison between Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Baffin which depict real speed of graphics processors, technology of production and the number of transistors. Here you learn which TDP GPUs have and whether it is possible to run them in the mode of overclocking.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Dimensions and Compatibility
Comparing Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Baffin, it is important to note the dimensions (length, width, and weight), interface and connectors.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Graphics memory (technical specifications)
GPUs’ memory influences the speed of the processing of the calculation, rendering, drawing of graphics in games and many more. The bigger the GPU memory is, the more modern its standard (for example, GDDR6X) is. The higher the clock speed and capacity is, the better it is. It is time to know which GPU, Intel Iris Graphics 550 or AMD Baffin , has a better memory.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Port and Display Support
Let’s compare Intel Iris Graphics 550 and Intel Iris Graphics 550 by the type of connectors, their number and the standard for connecting a monitor.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Technologies
Brand technology, used by companies for improving their production, is not accounted for the performing rating but can be useful for comparing the specs.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
API support
The technology of the development complexes has various versions. Learn what the difference between Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD Baffin in these parameters is.
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin
Mining hashrates
Performance and Games
The comparison of GPU#1 and GPU#2 in games shows the amount of FPS in any resolution. The testing was carried out at the stock assembly without overclocking, so the information can be different from the requested parameters.
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | ||||||
AMD Baffin | |||||||
Death Stranding (2020) | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | ||||||
AMD Baffin | |||||||
F1 2020 (2020) | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | ||||||
AMD Baffin | |||||||
Gears Tactics (2020) | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | ||||||
AMD Baffin | |||||||
Doom Eternal (2020) | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | ||||||
AMD Baffin |
Legend | |
5 | Stutter |
May Stutter | |
30 | Fluent – 25 fps + |
40 | Fluent – 35 fps + |
60 | Fluent – 55 fps + |
May Run Fluently | |
? | Uncertain |
Uncertain | |
no data |
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 550
10.5% faster in synthetic tests
Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 80 W)
Advantages of AMD Baffin
More pipelines (1024 vs 384)
G-SYNC support
VR Ready
Multi Monitor
So, Intel Iris Graphics 550 or AMD Baffin?
Which video card is better and more powerful? We recommend Intel Iris Graphics 550 .
Intel Iris Graphics 550 vs AMD Baffin in benchmarks comparison
3DMark Ice Storm is a modern synthetic benchmark for GPUs, used for evaluating performance in rendering. In 3DMark Ice Storm, you can check how fast a GPU of the old generation is and make conclusions about its modernization.
As 3DMark Cloud Gate Benchmark supports DirectX 10, its evaluation is rather suitable for GPUs of a medium level or the ones released 4 years ago.
3DMark Company has created a benchmark for GPUs called "Fire Strike Score", which points to the definite scenarios for fulfilling different variants and conditions of GPU running. The higher the evaluation of the 3DMark "Fire Strike Score" is, the more performing and faster a GPU is.
3DMark Fire Strike is a benchmark of GPUs, which reflects a GPU's testing results under factory conditions without overclocking, making it the most realistic in contrast to the custom dimensions of performance.
Being one of the most popular benchmarks for GPUs by far, 3DMark 11 is the authority among other programmes evaluating running or gaming performance. It supports tessellation, various calculating scenarios and account multithreading in GPUs testing.
3DMark Vantage Performance Benchmark accounts a GPU performance in multithreading that completely reveals all the potential of a graphics core and memory. Check the results to understand which GPU is better in the benchmark.