Intel Celeron 847
<>
Intel Core i5-9400H

Intel Celeron 847: 32 nm, Sandy Bridge, 2 X 1.10 GHz, DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM. 

Intel Core i5-9400H: 14 nm, Coffee Lake Refresh, 4 X 2.50 GHz, DDR4-2666 LPDDR3-2133. 

VS

Technical specs

CPU comparison by their number of cores, threads, base clock speed and speed in turbo boost can be found below. Please pay attention to the model, the specifications of which are the highest, as reflected in the common performance.

2 / 2
CPU Cores / Threads
4 / 8
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
No
Overclocking
No
1.10 GHz
Frequency
2.50 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
4.30 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (2 Cores)
no data
no data
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
No turbo

CPU generation and family

CPU Comparison by the type of usage (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Basic data on Intel Celeron 847 vs Intel Core i5-9400H comparison.

2
CPU Cores
4
Market price
ca. 250 $
6
Generation
9.5

iGPU

Not every CPU comparison gives the complete picture as not all the models are equipped with a built-in graphic core. Therefore, in the comparison between Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core i5-9400H, one of the columns can be blank because of the absence of iGPU specifications. If the built-in core is present, we recommend paying attention to the clock speed as other figures are secondary.

Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
GPU name
Intel UHD Graphics 630
0.35 GHz
GPU frequency
0.35 GHz
0.80 GHz
GPU (Turbo)
1.10 GHz
6
Execution units
24
48
Shader
192
2
Max. displays
3
6
Generation
9.5
10.1
Direct X
12
32 nm
Technology
14 nm
Q2/2011
Release date
Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Comparison by hardware support of various codecs and extensions. The section is for informational purposes only as it is not accounted for in benchmarks of synthetic performance testing.

No
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
No
JPEG
Decode / Encode

Memory Specifications

Modern CPUs support the memory operating in the multichannel mode that provides the high-speed exchange of data and increases performance. The higher the clock speed of the ram, its standard (e.g. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum capacity in the system are, the better it is.

2.0
PCIe version
3.0
16
PCIe lanes
16
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR4-2666 LPDDR3-2133
Max. Memory
128 GB
2
Memory channels
2
No
ECC
No
No
AES-NI
Yes

Thermal Management (TDP)

Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core i5-9400H TDP depict the whole information of a thermal pack. Here you can easily assume which CPU consumes more power and correspondingly requires a power supply of larger capacity. We recommend paying attention to a model with a low TDP as the component system needs the power reserve of not the power supply but the cooling system, as a CPU being loaded up does not always consume more power.

17 W
TDP
45 W
--
TDP up
--
--
TDP down
35 W
--
Tjunction max.
100 °C

Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of Intel Celeron 847 and Intel Core i5-9400H, we can see how fast the information is to proceed in the cache memory of L2 and L3. Also, you can compare the architecture of a core, a socket of motherboards and dates of CPUs' release here.

2.00 MB
L3-Cache
8.00 MB
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Coffee Lake Refresh
32 nm
Technology
14 nm
VT-x
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1023
Socket
BGA 1440
Q2/2011
Release date
Q2/2019

Use Conditions

Unknown
Used in
Unknown

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 Benchmark supports all the CPU cores in testing and takes into account hyperthreading. It was developed on the brand software company Cinema 4 Suite of Maxon. The Cinebench R15 scores are presented below.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The testing benchmark iGPU is integrated graphics cores in the central processor. The general graphics performance to benchmark the high-speed performance of the video chip is tested. The evaluation scores are presented below. Pay attention that not every manufacturer builds in an inner graphics core. Thus, the general results of the performance do not depend on this parameter, that is considered of good advantage.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Many wonders how good the scores of Geekbench 5 in testing CPUs are. So, we are here to answer: they are accurate and impartial to brands. The higher the evaluation of Geekbench 5 in testing performance of a CPU single core is, the better. Check out the results and compare them.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A 64-bit version of Geekbench 5 is used for testing CPU performance using all the cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 for multi-core models shows scores of how performing and fast a chip is in the review or comparison.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64 bit (single-core) is a benchmark used for testing CPUs in hard scenarios such as calculation and rendering in single-core operation. The testing results of performance are presented below.

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3, 64 bit (multi-core) is the first version of the professional synthetic benchmark which tests CPU performance in various scenarios of rendering and calculations. The benchmark involves all the cores and activates hyperthreading of a CPU.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 Benchmark for single-core CPUs is the first version of a professional synthetic app for testing performance. Cinebench R11.5 tests a single-core of a CPU without hyperthreading based on Cinema 4 Suite app. It suits the speed evaluation of CPUs of an earlier generation.

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R11.5 is used for multi-core given hyperthreading. Cinebench R11.5 tests the performance of all the CPU cores in the Cinema 4 Suite software. The results of the performance evaluation of all the CPU cores in Cinebench R11.5 can be found below.

PassMark CPU Mark

The evaluation of PassMark benchmark is more authoritative among all the experienced users. Exactly the PassMark takes the lead in testing CPU performance. The evaluation result of CPU speed is checked in the condition of complex calculation and 3D rendering.