AMD A4-1350
VS
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

AMD A4-1350: 28 nm, Temash, 4 X 1.00 GHz, DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM. 

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: 7 nm, Renoir (Zen 2), 8 X 2.90 GHz, DDR4-3200LPDDR4-4266. 

VS

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Essentials Specifications

AMD A4-1350 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H comparison by their number of cores, threads, base clock speed and speed in turbo boost can be found below. Please pay attention to the model, the specifications of which are the highest, as reflected in the common performance.

4x
Cores
no data
4 / 4
CPU Cores / Threads
8 / 16
normal
Core architecture
No
Hyperthreading
Yes
Yes
Overclocking
No
1.00 GHz
Frequency
2.90 GHz
No turbo
Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
--
Turbo Frequency (4 Cores)
no data
Turbo Frequency (8 Cores)
3.80 GHz

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
CPU generation and family

CPU Comparison by the type of usage (segment: mobile, desktop, laptop). Basic data on AMD A4-1350 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H comparison.

4
CPU Cores
8
AMD A4-1350
Name
no data
AMD A
Family
no data
AMD A4-1000
CPU group
no data
5
Generation
9
Mobile
Segment
no data
--
Predecessor
no data
--
Successor
no data

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Processor Graphics

Not every CPU comparison gives the complete picture as not all the models are equipped with a built-in graphic core. Therefore, in the comparison between AMD A4-1350 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, one of the columns can be blank because of the absence of iGPU specifications. If the built-in core is present, we recommend paying attention to the clock speed as other figures are secondary.

AMD Radeon HD 8210
GPU name
AMD Radeon 7 Graphics (Renoir)
0.30 GHz
GPU frequency
1.60 GHz
No turbo
GPU (Turbo)
No turbo
2
Execution units
7
128
Shader
448
2 GB
Max. GPU Memory
2
Max. displays
3
5
Generation
9
11.1
Direct X
12
28 nm
Technology
7 nm
Q2/2013
Release date
Q1/2020

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Hardware codec support

AMD A4-1350 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Comparison by hardware support of various codecs and extensions. The section is for informational purposes only as it is not accounted for in benchmarks of synthetic performance testing.

No
h265 8bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 10bit
Decode / Encode
No
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode
h264
Decode / Encode
No
VP8
Decode / Encode
No
VP9
Decode / Encode
No
AV1
Decode
AVC
Decode / Encode
Decode
VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
JPEG
Decode / Encode

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Memory Specifications

Modern CPUs support the memory operating in the multichannel mode that provides the high-speed exchange of data and increases performance. The higher the clock speed of the ram, its standard (e.g. DDR3, DDR4, DDR5) and maximum capacity in the system are, the better it is.

PCIe version
3.0
PCIe lanes
12
DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
Memory type
DDR4-3200LPDDR4-4266
Max. Memory
32 GB
2
Memory channels
2
--
Bandwidth
no data
No
ECC
Yes
Yes
AES-NI
Yes

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Thermal Management (TDP)

AMD A4-1350 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800H TDP depict the whole information of a thermal pack. Here you can easily assume which CPU consumes more power and correspondingly requires a power supply of larger capacity. We recommend paying attention to a model with a low TDP as the component system needs the power reserve of not the power supply but the cooling system, as a CPU being loaded up does not always consume more power.

8 W
TDP
45 W
8 W
TDP (PL1)
--
TDP (PL2)
--
TDP up
54 W
--
TDP down
35 W
--
Tjunction max.
105 °C

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Additional specifications

Based on the comparison of AMD A4-1350 and AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, we can see how fast the information is to proceed in the cache memory of L2 and L3. Also, you can compare the architecture of a core, a socket of motherboards and dates of CPUs' release here.

x86-64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
ISA extensions
no data
--
L2-Cache
4.00 MB
2.00 MB
L3-Cache
8.00 MB
Temash
Architecture
Renoir (Zen 2)
28nm
Technology
TSMC 7nm FinFET
AMD-V
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV
FT3
Socket
FP6
Q4/2013
Release date
Q1/2020
--
Part Number
100-000000098

AMD A4-1350 vs. AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
Use Conditions

Unknown
Used in
Notebooks HP, Lenovo, ASUS, MSI

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 Benchmark is an upgraded version of Cinebench R15 Benchmark. Similarly to the preceding one, this version was developed on the Cinema 4 Suite software. The benchmark tests the performance of a single-core CPU not given the hyperthreading. Here are the updated results to learn.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 benchmark produced by Maxon is a real cross-platform set of testing which evaluate the total CPU performance and operates on Cinema4D. The score of the Cinebench R23 (single-core) shows how efficient the CPU in games and operation is.

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

The Maxon Company has developed an accurate benchmark of CPU performance, Cinebench R20, based on the software complex Cinema 4 Suite. The scenarios of data proceeding and calculations reflect the efficiency high-performance of a CPU given all the cores and hyperthreading support.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is a cross-platform benchmark, which shows the accurate scores of CPU performance. The benchmark’s results reflect the real speed and efficiency of the CPU operation. It is designed on the Cinema 4D software. The testing accounts for hyperthreading and activates all the CPU cores. Learn the results below.

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

It is the Cinebench R15 benchmark for testing CPUs upon using a single core not given hyperthreading. The real performance in testing rendering is perfectly suitable for all the CPU segments. Learn Cinebench R15’s results and the number of scores below.

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 Benchmark supports all the CPU cores in testing and takes into account hyperthreading. It was developed on the brand software company Cinema 4 Suite of Maxon. The Cinebench R15 scores are presented below.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The testing benchmark iGPU is integrated graphics cores in the central processor. The general graphics performance to benchmark the high-speed performance of the video chip is tested. The evaluation scores are presented below. Pay attention that not every manufacturer builds in an inner graphics core. Thus, the general results of the performance do not depend on this parameter, that is considered of good advantage.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Many wonders how good the scores of Geekbench 5 in testing CPUs are. So, we are here to answer: they are accurate and impartial to brands. The higher the evaluation of Geekbench 5 in testing performance of a CPU single core is, the better. Check out the results and compare them.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

A 64-bit version of Geekbench 5 is used for testing CPU performance using all the cores and threads. The Geekbench 5 for multi-core models shows scores of how performing and fast a chip is in the review or comparison.